OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare radiation doses with respect to the type of examination and to correlate the results with the experience of the operator. The aim of this paper is also to compare the radiation doses of individual operators in correlation with the procedure and procedure for individual types of search. Also, the aim of this paper is to determine the difference in the radiation dose of individual operators in relation to the type of protection they use during the performance of similar tests. METHODS: There were 112 patients, of whom 61 were diagnosed and 51 were vascular intervention. In 91 patients the protection was used in full and in 21 patients only a small protection without a large screen was used. It can be stated that 12 operators participated in the research, of which 7 belong to the category of experienced operators who performed 74 procedures and 5 to the category of less experienced or inexperienced who performed 38 procedures. RESULTS: The conducted research did not confirm a statistically significant difference in the radiation dose with regard to the type of examination and the experience of the operator. After the obtained results, there were no statistically confirmed differences in the radiation dose of individual operators in relation to the type of protection they use during the performance of similar test. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained depend solely on the anatomy of the patient and the materials used.