Title Stavovi studenata zdravstvenih studija o prizivu savjesti u kliničkoj praksi Title (english) Attitudes of students of health studies on the appeal of conscience in clinical practice Author Ivona Perišić Mentor Diana Aranza (mentor)Committee member Mario Marendić (predsjednik povjerenstva)Committee member Silvija Vladislavić (član povjerenstva)Committee member Diana Aranza (član povjerenstva)Granter University of Split Defense date and country 2023-07-21, Croatia Scientific / art field, BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE Abstract UVOD: Priziv savjesti je sloboda mišljenja, savjesti i vjeroispovijedi te spada u ljudska prava i temeljne slobode zajamčene međunarodnim dokumentima, u prvom redu Općom deklaracijom o ljudskim pravima. Primaljstvo je područje zdravstvenih zanimanja koje se bavi pružanjem usluga trudnicama, novopečenim majkama i njihovoj dojenčadi. Zakon o primaljstvu ne propisuje pravo primalja kao što to propisuje Zakon o liječništvu i Zakon o sestrinstvu, no Etičkim kodeksom primalja je propisano da primalja ima pravo na priziv savjesti, ako time ne uzrokuje trajne posljedice za zdravlje ili ne ugrozi život pacijentice te o svojoj odluci mora pravodobno obavijestiti pacijenticu i uputiti je drugoj primalji. CILJ: Cilj ovog istraživanje je utvrditi stavove studenata zdravstvenih studija o prizivu savjesti u kliničkoj praki te utvrditi razlike u stavovima među studentima različitih strukovnih opredjeljenja unutar zdravstvenih studija. METODE: U ovome istraživanju sudjelovalo je 176 ispitanika svih dobnih skupina. Kriterij uključenja bili su sadašnji ili bivši studenti zdravstvenog usmjerenja. U ovom presječnom istraživanju korišteni mjerni instrument je Upitnik o stavovima bivših i sadašnjih studenata zdravstvenih studija o prizivu savjesti u kliničkoj praksi. Istraživanje je provedeno u svibnju 2023. REZULTATI: Istraživanje je pokazalo rezultate, većina ispitanika (80.7%) nije bila u prilici pozvati se na priziv savjesti, ali na pitanje kada bi ste radili na Klinici za ženske bolesti i porode biste li koristili pravni okvir mogućnosti priziva savjesti, 75 ispitanika odgovorilo je potvrdno. Prema istraživanju od 176 ispitanika, 74 ispitanika smatra da se legalan pobačaj bez medicinske indikacije ne bi trebao zabraniti dok 61 ispitanik izričito smatra da bi se legalan pobačaj bez medicinske indikacije trebo zabraniti. Većina ispitanika (60.2%) smatra da su upućeni što sve podrazumijeva priziv savjesti. ZAKLJUČCI: Rezultati ankete ne pokazuju različite stavove o prizivu savjesti među studentima različitih strukovnih opredjeljenja unutar zdravstvenih studija. Primaljama bi se trebao omogućiti bolji zakonski pristup prizivu savjesti, ne bi se trebale oslanjati samo na Etički kodeks primalja, već zahtjevati ravnopravni Zakon o primaljstvu koji propisuje pravo primalja na priziv savjesti kao što to propisuje Zakon o liječništvu i Zakon o sestrinsvu, zdravstveni djelatnici bi trebali biti ravnopravno zaštićeni pred zakonom.
Abstract (english) INTRODUCTION: The call of conscience is the freedom of thought, conscience and religion and belongs to human rights and fundamental freedoms guaranteed by international documents, primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Midwifery is a field of health professions that deals with the provision of services to pregnant women, new mothers and their infants. The Midwifery Act does not prescribe the right of midwives, as prescribed by the Act on Medicine and the Act on Nursing, but the Code of Ethics of Midwives stipulates that a midwife has the right to appeal to her conscience, if this does not cause permanent health consequences or endanger the patient's life, and about her decision must inform the patient in a timely manner and refer her to another midwife. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to determine the attitudes of students of health studies about the appeal of conscience in clinical practice and to determine the differences in attitudes among students of different professional orientations within health studies. METHODS: 176 respondents of all age groups participated in this research. The inclusion criteria were current or former health students. The measuring instrument used in this cross-sectional study is the Questionnaire on the attitudes of former and current students of health studies on the appeal of conscience in clinical practice. The research was conducted in May 2023. RESULTS: The research showed results, the majority of respondents (80.7%) did not have the opportunity to invite the appeal of conscience, but when asked if you would work at the Clinic for Women's Diseases and Childbirth, would you use the legal framework for the possibility of an appeal of conscience, 75 respondents answered is affirmative. According to a survey of 176 respondents, 74 respondents believe that legal abortion without medical indication should not be prohibited, while 61 respondents expressly believe that legal abortion without medical indication should be prohibited. The majority of respondents (60.2%) believe that they are knowledgeable, which all implies an appeal to conscience. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey do not show different attitudes about the appeal of conscience among students of different professions within health studies. Midwives should be given better legal access to appeal of conscience, they should not rely only on the Code of Ethics of Midwives, but demand an equal Midwifery Act that prescribes the right of midwives to appeal of conscience as prescribed by the Law on Medicine and the Law on Nursing, health professionals should should be equally protected before the law.
Keywords
priziv savjesti
primaljstvo
pobačaj
zakon
Keywords (english)
appeal of conscience
midwifery
abortion
law
Language croatian URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:176:864765 Study programme Title: Midwifery (university/undergraduate) Type of resource Text File origin Born digital Access conditions Open access Terms of use Created on 2023-07-28 08:16:48
